Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
×




Details

Submitted on
April 16, 2012
Image Size
198 KB
Resolution
600×807
Submitted with
Sta.sh
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
2,661 (1 today)
Favourites
94 (who?)
Comments
37
Downloads
49
×
Fight For Your Right To Government Dependency by iMaksim Fight For Your Right To Government Dependency by iMaksim
Political satire mocking the left with propaganda poster parody.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconblacksn0:
blacksn0 Featured By Owner 6 days ago  New member
I want to hang this on my wall
Reply
:iconjozhuawarren:
JozhuaWarren Featured By Owner May 26, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
I dare say only half the amusement comes from the Art. The rest comes from its fallout. LOL
Reply
:iconl-l-7:
l-l-7 Featured By Owner Mar 31, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
awesomeness! 
Reply
:iconneetsfagging322297:
Neetsfagging322297 Featured By Owner Dec 3, 2013
anarchistmedia.wordpress.com/t…

"Anarchistes" unhappy at the idea of less gov handouts.
Reply
:iconjoeisbadass:
joeisbadass Featured By Owner Sep 28, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Fight for your right to slavery! Fight for your right to tyranny! Liberate from liberty! Liberate from liberty! Liberate from liberty!
Reply
:iconhiirzch15:
Hiirzch15 Featured By Owner Aug 12, 2013
American independence is essentially a mass illusion of freedom.

Of course, you can live happily in your country without having faith in the government. I haven't voted since 1994.
Reply
:iconaaaaceace:
aaaaceace Featured By Owner Jul 6, 2013
God, you people make me sick with your stupidity.
Reply
:icondarkriderdlmc:
DarkRiderDLMC Featured By Owner Dec 24, 2013
I admire your balls, but not your brain,
this guy runs you over like a train,
you keep staggerin' back to your feet 'n' "Doh!"in,
with your skull all busted and grey matter showin'
you'd be better off finding someone slower, your mental equal,
and not humiliating yourself with yet another sad sequel.

Just my opinion, but it's based on seeing you jump this poster twice and come away looking really slow witted each time.  It's like watching a man armed with a banana fight a tiger.  Messy, funny and sad.
Reply
:iconimaksim:
iMaksim Featured By Owner Jul 7, 2013
Is that all you got? Not much of an argument.
Reply
:iconaaaaceace:
aaaaceace Featured By Owner Jul 7, 2013
I am not going to waste my intelligence trying to get you too stop being stupid.
Reply
:iconimaksim:
iMaksim Featured By Owner Jul 7, 2013
Ha! Like anyone believes you are smart enough to debate me.
Reply
:iconaaaaceace:
aaaaceace Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2013
You know my grandparents both use the Meals on Wheel's program and Social Security, which have allowed them to stay fairly independent. In fact without the government's help they would ether be living with another family member or in a nursing home.
Reply
:iconimaksim:
iMaksim Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2013
Why are you or your parents not taking care of them? Why do you find it acceptable for strangers and taxpayers to provide for YOUR family? I feel sorry for your grandparents that they have such a shitty grandkid.
Reply
:iconaaaaceace:
aaaaceace Featured By Owner Dec 24, 2013
Because my grandparents value their independence and do not wish to be taken care of by their children or grandchildren. Programs like the Meals on Wheel's allows them to keep their dignity well into their later years. On top of that it is an honor and a patriotic duty to pay my taxes, knowing that they are going to help people like my grandparents get through their daily lives. Also at this time I am letting my other grandfather who can no longer live on his own stay at my house until we can find him a place to stay that will make his final days as comftible as possible.  

So please take your insulting, badly thought out, incorrect, manipulative, piece of propaganda bull shit and shove it up your ass hole you insensitive piece of human wast.  

PS: If you are a true patriotic American who pay's his taxes despite not agreeing with them, then on behalf of my grandparents may God bless you.    
Reply
:iconimaksim:
iMaksim Featured By Owner Dec 25, 2013
Independence. You keep using that word, I don't think it means what you think it means.
Reply
:icondarkriderdlmc:
DarkRiderDLMC Featured By Owner Dec 24, 2013
In his grandparents defense regarding Social Security, they probably paid the ss taxes from paychecks over thirty or more working years.

It's way less their responsibility to not take what they mistakenly believed they wee paying for than it is the politicians to both fix the mess they've created with it and either phase it out or turn it into a non-ponzi scheme.

And yes, if families took the responsibility for their elderly that they should...
Reply
:iconebturner:
ebturner Featured By Owner Dec 24, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
Bam! Drops mic. Walks off stage.

Well played, well played.
Reply
:iconketchupgirlx:
ketchupgirlX Featured By Owner Feb 4, 2013
We shouldn't have to fight for our right to government dependency, we're entitled to it.

(no I kid. nice poster.)
Reply
:iconsherrys-camera:
Sherrys-Camera Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
GREAT!!!! The Chains really make the point so blatant.... even the liberals can't miss it! lolol
Reply
:icondeadsomething:
DeadSomething Featured By Owner Nov 19, 2012
wow, this is so great :D in todays situation and also this so much fits the fallout series setting :D
Reply
:iconsuperduperccd:
SuperDuperCCD Featured By Owner Nov 18, 2012
The thing is, this is exactly how liberals/leftists/socialists think. Well, they come in two strains, actually.

There are these, who feel weak, dumb, and absolutely vulnerable... and they want a big nanny state to watch over them. They don't think they could make it on their own either way, so they'd rather be "house niggers" (regardless of race) than toiling in the fields. The fact that the gate is unlocked either never occurred to them, or they fear the even scarier ghosts and ghouls that surely must lie in wait for them out there. They wear their own chains.

Then there's the second variety of leftist... the one who is so sure of himself, whether he has accomplished anything or not, that he thinks the silver bullet solution to the world's problems is if he can run every aspect of your life, too! This is where you get mayors smugly declaring that you may no longer buy a soda larger than 16 ounces, because sodas are bad for you after all, or thundering that no one should be able to own a firearm... except for their own police and guards, of course.

The second variety is far more sinister, the first is just pathetic. But it is the first that enables the second.
Reply
:iconkajm:
Kajm Featured By Owner Apr 18, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
Featured! [link]
Reply
:iconblamethe1st:
BlameThe1st Featured By Owner Apr 17, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
It really amazes me how many libtarded moonbats are turned off by the idea of personal responsibility, of being able to pull yourself up by your own bootstraps and helping yourself. Yes, we all need a little help from each other. Nobody contests that. The problem is that the government programs and social safety nets that are supposed to help people out of poverty have failed to do so. Yet suggest any mention of reform and they start screaming “Social Darwinist!” Sad.
Reply
:iconpaulwe:
Paulwe Featured By Owner Nov 18, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Libtarded? Excuse me?

I am all for personal responsibility and all of the stuff that this deviation is supposed to be about, but instituting the law of the jungle because efforts to stop poverty have failed is like creating a police state because efforts to stop crime have failed. If you damn republicans would see past your own noses you'd realize that what you're saying is absurd.

Looking at your page, you are obviously very, very conservative, very Christian (which is fine, but it doesn't mix well with right-wing politics), and probably a gun nut too. EVEN YOUR FUCKING USERNAME IS REPUBLICAN!

And as for your comment, the same goes for "consevatarded sunmonkeys", which is just as rude as the phrase you used for us. I'm a democratic socialist myself, and all that means is a responsibility to share wealth you don't need. It's NOT communism, which is by the way a really stupid idea. But when I try and explain that to people like YOU, they start shrieking "Communist! Anti-American!" and running around like chickens with their heads cut off.

Maybe neither of us a right, but the point is you should really hear our side of the story before you talk about us like we're brain-dead.
Reply
:iconblamethe1st:
BlameThe1st Featured By Owner Nov 19, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
First, I use the term, along with "moonbat," because I don't feel "liberal" is a bad word or a bad concept. Jefferson was a liberal. Of course, today he would be considered a right-wing extremist by "liberals" like Michael Moore. Which is why I ascribe the term "moonbat" to them.

And I have been trying to understand you libs. I've been studying you in your natural habitats like HuffPo and Daily Kos and r/politics. I'm sorry to say that after years of study, my opinion of you all have not improved.

You say you're for personal responsibility. Thing is, whenever the concept is brought up amoung libtarded moonbats, they tend to treat it with scorn. "Personal responsibility? You mean every man for himself? That's selfish! That's freedom to starve. We need to care about society and all because social contract."

Maybe you're not that way, but I see no reason to think otherwise with past encounters with these people.

And no, I'm not Republican, at least, not anymore. I'm a libertarian. I voted for Johnson in this election. Would have voted for Paul if he were the Rep canidate. Then again, those two are considered to the right of Hitler by many moonbats, even though half of what they stand for they agree with.
Reply
:iconpaulwe:
Paulwe Featured By Owner Nov 19, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
First off, I am not like HuffPo or Daily Kos for the simple reason that I'm Canadian. The most right-wing person in Canada could be considered Communist by American standards. Stick THAT in your pipe and smoke it!

Well, if you mean personal responsibility in that way, then, no, I do not believe in personal responsibility. How would you like it if you were a homeless person and were denied food and money because you were told that it's "every man for himself"? Exactly.

Libertarian is considered a dirty word in Canada in the same way that liberal is in America, FYI.
Reply
:iconsalinger1:
Salinger1 Featured By Owner Jan 13, 2013
Why SHOULD unnesecery or Excess wealth belong to another person or state? Why should it be used for the poor or industries. Why can't that excess wealth be used in any way the owner wants it? Maybe he could build something like a shelter or a store. The best way out of poverty is either charity, Hard work, or education. The third one requiring sacrifice on the first.
Reply
:iconsalinger1:
Salinger1 Featured By Owner Jan 13, 2013
There is a thing called charity, Most wealthier societies aren't heartless. If anything, Canadians can be pretty right wing with Instituet De Economique de Montreal. Your style of argument makes you as bad as Blame the 1sts comment.
Reply
:iconblamethe1st:
BlameThe1st Featured By Owner Nov 22, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Obviously, I did not mean personal responsibility like that! I was simply using the hyperbolic strawman libtards use.

With its healthcare system aside, Canada is actually quite laissez-faire. It's consistently ranked as more economically free than America, and it's "liberal" Prime Minister successfully implemented evil "austerity" to its country's benefit. Somehow I think folks exaggerate when they claim Canada is socialist.
Reply
:iconavatarfan2012:
avatarfan2012 Featured By Owner Jul 21, 2012
Cound'nt have said it better my self!!
Reply
:iconmike-the-cat:
Mike-the-cat Featured By Owner Jul 11, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
The amount of ignorant comments I got for this submission boggles my mind.

[link]
Reply
:iconblamethe1st:
BlameThe1st Featured By Owner Jul 21, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Ugh! The ones by LBtheCC are the worst. Why would anyone argue against the existence of human rights. It’s basically themselves writing their own death warrants. We are born with rights. They derive from God through nature (or just nature if you are an atheist), not government. If it comes from someone else, it’s not a right. That’s basic logic. Rights have to be inprescriptable; otherwise, they’re not rights.
Reply
:iconbttlrp:
bttlrp Featured By Owner Aug 18, 2013
How do they derive from god/nature?
Reply
:iconotatsuke:
Otatsuke Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2013
I am Extremely appreciative of the fact that you think allow people other religions. Too many people are too arrogant, among other things, to do such a thing.
There is one point that I, personally, do not fully agree with: "or just nature." Things like rights are a human mindset. There is technically nothing to do with nature. [Assuming the reader is non-religious,] Humans have created a standard for "Right" and "Wrong." Nature has nothing to do human mindsets.
Aside from that, I'd say you hit the nail straight on the head.
Reply
:icongryphon2001:
Gryphon2001 Featured By Owner Apr 17, 2012
The Sorry thing is, so many of the Sheeple would read this and involuntarily Agree....
Reply
:iconkajm:
Kajm Featured By Owner Apr 16, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
This one will be featured in my next journal entry.
Reply
:iconkdennisnaz:
kdennisnaz Featured By Owner Apr 16, 2012
absolutely love it! Long live the masses of the enslaved.
Reply
Add a Comment: