| Deviant Login | Shop | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
#PropagandaCenter
| Digital Art / Vector / Conceptual | ©2012-2013 ~iMaksim |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `ChewedKandi has certainly gone out of her way to keep the vector community on the right path. Always making sure that her talents are infinitely scalable, Sharon has put her bezier curves to excellent use, and firmly anchored herself as an inspirational leader. We're absolutely delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for June 2013 to `ChewedKandi. Congratulations, Sharon! Read More
|
Sta.sh
(no I kid. nice poster.)
There are these, who feel weak, dumb, and absolutely vulnerable... and they want a big nanny state to watch over them. They don't think they could make it on their own either way, so they'd rather be "house niggers" (regardless of race) than toiling in the fields. The fact that the gate is unlocked either never occurred to them, or they fear the even scarier ghosts and ghouls that surely must lie in wait for them out there. They wear their own chains.
Then there's the second variety of leftist... the one who is so sure of himself, whether he has accomplished anything or not, that he thinks the silver bullet solution to the world's problems is if he can run every aspect of your life, too! This is where you get mayors smugly declaring that you may no longer buy a soda larger than 16 ounces, because sodas are bad for you after all, or thundering that no one should be able to own a firearm... except for their own police and guards, of course.
The second variety is far more sinister, the first is just pathetic. But it is the first that enables the second.
I am all for personal responsibility and all of the stuff that this deviation is supposed to be about, but instituting the law of the jungle because efforts to stop poverty have failed is like creating a police state because efforts to stop crime have failed. If you damn republicans would see past your own noses you'd realize that what you're saying is absurd.
Looking at your page, you are obviously very, very conservative, very Christian (which is fine, but it doesn't mix well with right-wing politics), and probably a gun nut too. EVEN YOUR FUCKING USERNAME IS REPUBLICAN!
And as for your comment, the same goes for "consevatarded sunmonkeys", which is just as rude as the phrase you used for us. I'm a democratic socialist myself, and all that means is a responsibility to share wealth you don't need. It's NOT communism, which is by the way a really stupid idea. But when I try and explain that to people like YOU, they start shrieking "Communist! Anti-American!" and running around like chickens with their heads cut off.
Maybe neither of us a right, but the point is you should really hear our side of the story before you talk about us like we're brain-dead.
And I have been trying to understand you libs. I've been studying you in your natural habitats like HuffPo and Daily Kos and r/politics. I'm sorry to say that after years of study, my opinion of you all have not improved.
You say you're for personal responsibility. Thing is, whenever the concept is brought up amoung libtarded moonbats, they tend to treat it with scorn. "Personal responsibility? You mean every man for himself? That's selfish! That's freedom to starve. We need to care about society and all because social contract."
Maybe you're not that way, but I see no reason to think otherwise with past encounters with these people.
And no, I'm not Republican, at least, not anymore. I'm a libertarian. I voted for Johnson in this election. Would have voted for Paul if he were the Rep canidate. Then again, those two are considered to the right of Hitler by many moonbats, even though half of what they stand for they agree with.
Well, if you mean personal responsibility in that way, then, no, I do not believe in personal responsibility. How would you like it if you were a homeless person and were denied food and money because you were told that it's "every man for himself"? Exactly.
Libertarian is considered a dirty word in Canada in the same way that liberal is in America, FYI.